This topic has been archived. It cannot be replied.
-
枫下茶话 / 政治经济 / 保守党减税, 自由党加税, NDP倾向穷人,加更多的税。如果你决定让选举简单化,数量化,你可否定两个数 A > B.这样的话,你的收入>A, 投保守党;如果 < B, 选NDP。Otherwise, 听天由命,或者投自由党。A, B 多少合适?
-james05(关不上的窗);
2011-4-15
(#6623018@0)
-
if family incoming over 200,000$
-ineaton(AN);
2011-4-15
(#6623039@0)
-
just some $$ for average family incoming in 2008 and the Party to win.. so if over $200K go for CON
-ineaton(AN);
2011-4-15
{138}
(#6623658@0)
-
看来10W是个槛。
-james05(关不上的窗);
2011-4-15
(#6623832@0)
-
所以肉联支持保守党的多。
-lionel(Lionel);
2011-4-15
(#6623925@0)
-
你的命题不完全成立,不过还挺好玩。如果一定让我选两个数,那么 A=$50万,B=$5万。但是请记住不是所有的人都只向钱看。
-iron(swim, bike & run);
2011-4-15
(#6623054@0)
-
看来保守党得等通货膨胀XX年后才能当选,而且你的数字不许通胀。
-james05(关不上的窗);
2011-4-15
(#6623170@0)
-
保守党得等通货膨胀XX年后才能得到我的选票。但这只是我的数字,换个人可能就是$10万和$5万。
-iron(swim, bike & run);
2011-4-15
(#6623190@0)
-
原来保守党在位其间有这么多50万的家庭
-maplew2008(9.1.1.);
2011-4-15
(#6623294@0)
-
哎呀,俺才挣1/4啊。
-james05(关不上的窗);
2011-4-15
(#6623498@0)
-
所以说什么50万,2M的人都是自己没有脑子的人,也不知道保守党的选票都是从哪里来的。
-ding_ding(丁_丁);
2011-4-15
(#6623578@0)
-
4万家庭收入在4万以上基本上没有什么福利,退税可拿回来,只剩下为穷人做贡献。所以家庭收入在4万以上的希望税越少越好。虽然这次选举没有哪个党说要增加所得税,但增加开支总不是什么好兆头。
-2841999(大力丸子);
2011-4-15
{176}
(#6623570@0)
-
当低/无收入家庭无法得到社会帮助的话? 他们将如何生存?--社区治安恶化,房价大跌。 美国有很多城市可以说明这一点。当低/无收入家庭无法得到社会帮助的话? 他们将如何生存?--社区治安恶化,房价大跌。 美国有很多城市可以说明这一点。=所以只有你的收入可以担负你在郊区或高尚住宅区时。
-ineaton(AN);
2011-4-15
{165}
(#6623627@0)
-
4万去掉税,剩下的钱养家糊口也不容易。你是不是挣钱太多了想发发慈悲?自己先过好了再想着慈善别人。
-2841999(大力丸子);
2011-4-15
(#6623719@0)
-
Provincial average home incoming $90,526 National average home incoming $82,325
-ineaton(AN);
2011-4-16
(#6624863@0)
-
4W以上就选保守党,呵呵,看来这次肯定majority了。
-james05(关不上的窗);
2011-4-16
(#6624553@0)
-
harper要减的是公司税。公司大股东/大公司雇员本来就better off,harper准备让这些人更加better off。
这就是在加国条件下的阶级斗争新动向。
-antihardcorerighty2(哈哈哈);
2011-4-15
(#6623742@0)
-
No and Yes. 资本家的理论是,减公司税可创造就业机会,让没工作的人有工作做。中国古语说:“授人以鱼,三餐之需;授人以渔,终生之用"。
-james05(关不上的窗);
2011-4-16
(#6624560@0)
-
Bush did it for US companies. However, they just used the money to expand in Asia and East Europe. Their failure in east Europe contributed a lot to the so called the financial crisis.
-electionagain(tony);
2011-4-16
(#6624571@0)
-
减税 is just a joke. Today's gas price is CAD 1.35! There are another ways to tax people like this.
-electionagain(tony);
2011-4-16
(#6624566@0)
-
High gas price is not because of tax, but because of those greedy oil companies.
-james05(关不上的窗);
2011-4-16
(#6625037@0)
-
This is one thing I do not like Harper. He is simply lying! Like it or not, tax in both Canada and US will increase in the long run.
-electionagain(tony);
2011-4-16
(#6624569@0)
-
LZ让你们谈一下A,B多少合适。走题。发回重贴。不要介意哦。
-mingyangli(好好活==干有意义的事);
2011-4-16
{12}
(#6624574@0)
-
There is no such thing like this. Over 60% people who earned more than USD 200,000 voted for Obama. It is the way how to earn your money that makes the difference.
-electionagain(tony);
2011-4-16
(#6624582@0)
-
Link please?
-mingyangli(好好活==干有意义的事);
2011-4-16
(#6624589@0)
-
Do not remember. It was the news right after Obama was elected.
-electionagain(tony);
2011-4-16
(#6624598@0)
-
Found one for you. In total it was 52%. But I remembered it talked about certain range stuff.
-electionagain(tony);
2011-4-16
(#6624608@0)
-
It's somewhere for sure. The link below gives a different perspective
-thornthorn(Holy Moly);
2011-4-16
(#6624615@0)
-
I put it here. "By income, 52 percent of voters with more than $200,000 in annual income voted for Obama."
-electionagain(tony);
2011-4-16
(#6624624@0)
-
偶相信你讲的。但LZ让谈一下A,B多少合适。嘻嘻,审题不严密。
-mingyangli(好好活==干有意义的事);
2011-4-16
(#6625036@0)