This topic has been archived. It cannot be replied.
-
枫下茶话 / 政治经济 / Obama thinks the cause of this crisis is 'credit freeze' -- meaning the banks are afraid to lend money. He can't be more wrong. This article provides a good analysis on what went wrong. 'Globalization' is the root cause of the economic collapse.
-omega4(omega);
2009-2-25
{5258}
(#5075211@0)
-
Hillary Clinton said it: 'China's human right issue is unimportant comparing to other pressing issues like the economic crisis and climate change".
-omega4(omega);
2009-2-25
{394}
(#5075522@0)
-
中国成为了世界工厂不是主动的行为。共党的改革,打开国门,带着钱来投资的是外国资本跨国公司。敲打中国,要中国融入世界贸易体系的是美国和日本。
-triton(智者乐水);
2009-2-25
{748}
(#5076233@0)
-
对南亚拉美小国,米国就好象站在食物链的顶端,可以用金融业把财富骗回去,从而实现平衡。可这一招对中国不灵,一下就断粮。
-321gold(老道);
2009-3-4
(#5092308@0)
-
The strange thing is that very few politicians or economists admit this problem. Yesterday's CNN poll shows 93% of American believe globalization is the problem that caused economic crisis.At the same time, Obama told Brown that he believes globalization is the solution to the crisis. Either the majority of American people are plain stupid, or the politicians and elite class are trying to hide some thing that everybody else can see obviously
-omega4(omega);
2009-3-4
{256}
(#5092329@0)
-
很简单的逻辑,谁是全球化最大的受益者?美国人民?中国人民?提供廉价劳动力的第三世界国家?
-kingsw(Steven);
2009-3-4
(#5092339@0)
-
It favors those who control capital (and politicians who work for them), against those who work for a living.In other words, it futher enriches the rich and powerful in every country, US, China alike, while undermining the living standard of the working class in every country. So it's not which country that wins, it's which class that wins. Of course, the capitalists and corrupted politicians in the world should avoid become too arrogant and greedy, and totally forget about sharing a bit of their gain, otherwise, they can't survive when the whole ship sinks
-omega4(omega);
2009-3-4
{458}
(#5092378@0)
-
如果这个世界没有种族的话,你的结论可以成立。但是这个世界是分化且组合的。危机存在时相互合作,解除后变相互竞争,竞争总好过争斗或是战争。至于最富的那一群,是不怕沉船的。一他们根本不在船上,二越乱机会越多,他们拥有社会运作的必须资源。
-kingsw(Steven);
2009-3-4
(#5092412@0)
-
某种程度上,这种说法是正确的。不过游戏的规则不是中国在掌握。仅仅获得话语权是不够的。这是场战争,输的一方将失去至少30年。
-kingsw(Steven);
2009-3-4
(#5092347@0)
-
说说不同意见。今天的NationalPost的FinancialPost文章 : America needs China
-triton(智者乐水);
2009-2-25
(#5076328@0)
-
这是事实,任谁也无法反驳,合则两利,问题是这个合双方存在多大程度的诚意。目前看两边都在首鼠两端。这个合也仅限于彼此共同的利益。中国的经济强势每坚持一天,中美的纽带就加强一点。双方都在等待对方的极点出现。
-kingsw(Steven);
2009-3-4
(#5092358@0)