This topic has been archived. It cannot be replied.
-
枫下茶话 / 政治经济 / 俗话说:躲得过初一,躲不过十五。哈跑跑将面对一个更强大的对手,1月26日,国会重开之日,正逢中国农历大年初一,哈跑跑总理跑还是不跑?
-humptydumpty(一下打死七个);
2008-12-10
{636}
(#4908912@0)
-
Agree with No3/4. Would like to see him HA HA HA"裸奔 and 抱住了女领导的大腿"
-axe(Just A Joke);
2008-12-10
{31}
(#4908920@0)
-
这个是不是比Dion强,要看他的政策。政策还没出台,你这就开吹了,太早了点。从前Dion大选的时候,拍马屁的和现在一起推翻他的是同一群傻子。自己没原则,只知道跟着党走,智商不高嘛。
-szs11(钉子户);
2008-12-10
(#4909046@0)
-
从上次自由党选举时就可以看出来Michael 与Dion孰高孰低了。如果大家都不跟 着党走还要党干嘛?上学时留级掉队跟不上的大多属于智商不高的那种。
-humptydumpty(一下打死七个);
2008-12-10
(#4909306@0)
-
我们是选民,各政党要提出大家喜欢的纲领,纲领不对头,下台去吧。为什么要跟着党走呢,党要跟着选民走,才对头。常识而已。
-szs11(钉子户);
2008-12-10
(#4909356@0)
-
You overvalued voters. Most voters do not really know about a party’s platform what so ever nor do they really follow it. Media can make them believe evil is justice. Harper’s attack ads is best example.
.
-axe(Just A Joke);
2008-12-10
(#4909927@0)
-
从国家利益看,重新选举和联合政府都不是最佳选择。如果亦格纳提夫能够与保守党合作,则国家之幸,百姓之福也。
-rollor(Rollor);
2008-12-10
(#4909542@0)
-
合作是指自由保守两党联合,还是让自由党顺着harper不在国会添麻烦?这两样都不可能行得通。
-grainsw(两只小猪);
2008-12-10
(#4909557@0)
-
等预算案提出,反对党攻击的把柄就没有如此强大了。
-caa(移民的孙悟空lifeisok);
2008-12-10
(#4909940@0)
-
昨天哈总理说得清楚,反对党可以一切协商预算,听取不同意见。
-caa(移民的孙悟空lifeisok);
2008-12-10
(#4909943@0)
-
He also didn't admit he did nor has he done anything wrong. He was cutting off Peter once and again. That would be a tough call when meeting with opposition.
-axe(Just A Joke);
2008-12-10
(#4910129@0)
-
议会一旦复会,哈珀就不是总理了,还搞什么预算。哈珀的第一要务就是想方设法在“人民总理”的位置上法赖下去。手段不过就是许诺收买离间,大家擦亮眼睛,看看加国的哈珀是不是比陈水扁更crook。
-shuangdai(supershuang);
2008-12-10
(#4910244@0)
-
If you don't like a person, then whatever he does is wrong. Harper was democratically elected just a few weeks ago, removing him without election is going to anger a lot of people and cost Liberal the votesIf Michael is smart, he would rethink the coalition with the NDP
-omega4(omega);
2008-12-10
{64}
(#4910267@0)
-
你错了
-shuangdai(supershuang);
2008-12-10
(#4910276@0)
-
The poll already show that most Liberal supporters (including Manley) don't like the idea of coalition with the NDP and Bloc. Even Michael says the coalition is just one of the options.
-omega4(omega);
2008-12-10
(#4910293@0)
-
Harper对民主的理解比你的理解更经典哈
-shuangdai(supershuang);
2008-12-10
(#4910446@0)
-
if Harper were really smart enough he would not have shut down the parliament and ran away.
-axe(Just A Joke);
2008-12-10
(#4910315@0)
-
少数党政府的特点,就是在与其它党妥协的情况下实施自己的政策。自由党与保守党的合作,当然是两党谈判,互相妥协。
-rollor(Rollor);
2008-12-10
(#4909989@0)
-
Correct. Let's hope compromises can be made from by parties specially Harper.
-axe(Just A Joke);
2008-12-10
(#4910134@0)
-
你让骗子骗了一个,算你倒霉,你让骗子骗了两次,你愿意让骗子再骗下去吗?如果你愿意,我支持两党合作。否则的话,还是让那些台上的政治人物去计较吧。
-killer(十步杀一人千里不留行);
2008-12-10
(#4910779@0)
-
自由党真正想上台就得把NDP Bloc蹬了, 拉着这哥俩等于累赘。我们看看怎么蹬法。
-weichen2005(重在参和);
2008-12-10
(#4910352@0)
-
UP today.
-axe(Just A Joke);
2008-12-10
(#4910357@0)
-
提前解散倒没准顺应民意给自己将来上台铺路。
-weichen2005(重在参和);
2008-12-10
(#4910396@0)
-
你们为什么就不能尊重下选民?既然保守党是相对多数,那他就是能代表多数人意志,难道更少票数的党反而是正义些了?无论选项如何,最后胜出的,还是保守党,否则公义在哪里?
-fxid(闲聊灌水);
2008-12-10
(#4910382@0)
-
你有点常识好吗?保守党能上台,本来就不是公义的体现,他是利用了规则的便宜,明明其他三党,在加上绿党,都是左翼政党,凭什么保守党执政?
-killer(十步杀一人千里不留行);
2008-12-10
(#4910773@0)