This topic has been archived. It cannot be replied.
-
枫下拾英 / 心灵感悟 / ZT// 科学?宗教? 从哲学角度看
-647i(流浪的步行万里);
2007-12-23
{3317}
(#4136346@0)
-
science is not philosophy, period. 在一开始就偷换概念,后面的也没什么好看了。通篇逻辑混乱。
-buma(蔓毒黛扬);
2007-12-23
(#4140593@0)
-
下篇更是迷迷瞪瞪,作者看来没什么人文科学的基础。所以才说出“如果你追求的是心灵的寄托,科学帮不了你“这种话。
-buma(蔓毒黛扬);
2007-12-23
(#4140602@0)
-
那句话我没有觉得哪里不合适啊?也许是我晕,你给个给个反例听听
-647i(流浪的步行万里);
2007-12-23
(#4140627@0)
-
什么是心灵的寄托?杀人狂寄情于屠戮,诗人画家寄情于山水。这个命题和科学宗教有什么关系?science :
social science
natural science
formal science
科学 has much more to offer than religion in every perspectives. Period.
religion is dying like an old man, the increased religious population in developing countries comparing to the falling numbers in developed countries is one strong evidence that religion needs to find new blood.
-buma(蔓毒黛扬);
2007-12-23
{345}
(#4140928@0)
-
我只能说你看"科学"和"宗教"的眼界太窄了
-647i(流浪的步行万里);
2007-12-23
(#4140941@0)
-
我觉得原文作者把宗教和信仰混到一起了,大片段落讲的是信仰(faith)而不是宗教,而两者是不一样的。
-buma(蔓毒黛扬);
2007-12-25
(#4143258@0)