This topic has been archived. It cannot be replied.
-
枫下佳缘 / 情爱悠悠 / 都瞎操什么心呢。她若骗婚商婚,保险公司肯定最希望查明核实的了。一个月一千多,付上四五十年,他们比谁损失都大
-ruoer(乡下人);
2007-3-7
(#3538460@0)
-
聪明!不过YOU'RE PARTLY RIGHT。保险公司那比钱怎么样都要付的,不是给冰,就是给安的孩子
-iamjeff(havefun);
2007-3-7
(#3538561@0)
-
If it is until the kid finishes his secondary education, it is still better to prove the case: the wife has at least another 40 years (on average), but the kid will have only 10 years at the most.
-ruoer(乡下人);
2007-3-7
(#3538708@0)
-
条款是怎么定的?为什么HIS WIFE就可以GOT PAID FOR THE REST OF HER LIFE, BUT HIS KID GOT PAID ONLY UP TO THE AGE HE BECOMES AN ADULT? 难道不是一比LUMPSUM PAYMENT?
-iamjeff(havefun);
2007-3-7
(#3538721@0)
-
Doesn't sound like it is a lumpsum from all the postings. I doubt anyone here studied the insurance policy.
-ruoer(乡下人);
2007-3-7
(#3538738@0)
-
Even though someone here has indeed studied insurance law or policy, he/she still cannot figure out what the result of An Gang's case might be, because cases are different, and till this moment, nobody really knows what is in An's policy,so that it's hard to jump to the conclusion.
-asker(amour);
2007-3-7
{45}
(#3539009@0)
-
MM, pay attention to what I wrote. I said "the insurance policy", which is AN's insurance policy.
-ruoer(乡下人);
2007-3-7
(#3539173@0)
-
So what is An Gang's insurance policy? I bet those 7 are not very sure of it yet, let alone others like you and me.
-asker(amour);
2007-3-7
(#3539789@0)
-
I am just guessing. If An is alive, he would only need to support his son until he finishes his secondary education, but wife is a life time commitment.
-ruoer(乡下人);
2007-3-7
(#3538741@0)
-
No, according to the Canadian law, he only needs to support his son till the son turns 18 years old. That's all. He can choose to pay or NOT to pay for his post-secondary education,which is not his legitimate obligation.
-asker(amour);
2007-3-7
(#3538992@0)
-
That is not true. Ask those who had been through a divorce before, you would know.
-ruoer(乡下人);
2007-3-7
(#3539112@0)
-
I don't need to ask them, cause my professor in law told me this.
-asker(amour);
2007-3-7
(#3539790@0)
-
He does not have the legitimate obligation to support his children through the post-secondary education, but once he makes the choice with his ex in a divorce, he will be legally obligated, and in that case, he has to.
-asker(amour);
2007-3-7
(#3539806@0)
-
Say, his wife might get 10,0000 from the insurance. Do you think the 10,0000 is enough for the rest of her life? The company has no obligation to be responsible for the REST OF ANYONE's life, and it depends on how much money you can get ONCE FOR ALL.
-asker(amour);
2007-3-7
(#3539001@0)
-
It really depends on the term of the policy. Not every insurance policy is a lump sum payment. Some works similar to pension plans.
-ruoer(乡下人);
2007-3-7
(#3539119@0)
-
Thing is that at this point, NOBODY knows his policy, and everyone here is just guessing and guessing.
-asker(amour);
2007-3-7
(#3539792@0)
-
Whether 骗婚商婚 or not is NOT the business of the insurance company, and 骗婚商婚 is supposed to be under the charge of the Canadian criminal law.
-asker(amour);
2007-3-7
(#3539014@0)
-
恩。
-mine888(老想上进);
2007-3-7
(#3539055@0)
-
Of course it is the business of the insurance company! If the marriage is proved to be void, she would no longer be "the spouse of the deseased" any longer. Then the insurance company maybe able to save some compensation.Whoever would benefit the most from the case, have the deepest pocket, would be the best person to initiate the law suit. If they don't, maybe there is no case.
-ruoer(乡下人);
2007-3-7
{161}
(#3539095@0)
-
Okay, 我去问个清楚吧。以我的理解,保险公司按法律办事,如果法律文件上张是安的合法妻子,张不是诈骗保险(比如放火下毒什么的),保险公司就不会调查。只有移民局会对张的case感兴趣,因为这牵涉到移民的问题。我在去问问我的朋友吧,他是一著名保险公司的VP.是律师。
-mine888(老想上进);
2007-3-7
{53}
(#3539132@0)
-
"移民局会对张的case感兴趣", no way, unless An Gang was still alive and sued her himself. Once An died, nobody could succeed in accusing her of cheating in the documentation of her marriage, cause An Gang was the only other witeness besides Zhang.
-asker(amour);
2007-3-7
(#3539800@0)
-
The whole marriage thing is like "You know, I know, and God knows." Now, An passed away, Zhang would definitely not stand out to sue herself. Just forget this marriage thing.
-asker(amour);
2007-3-7
(#3539802@0)
-
Not necessary... Maybe there was some trace left. Email communications, contract on paper, money transaction and receipts...
-ruoer(乡下人);
2007-3-8
(#3541277@0)
-
My point is why the insurance company has to doubt Zhang's legal status as his wife. In addition, which insurance company loves to waste its money to do the Canadian criminal justice a favour, and save others' money?
-asker(amour);
2007-3-7
(#3539796@0)
-
I am talking about saving their own money if the policy states they have to pay $$$$ to the spouse of the deceased per month till a maximum is reached.Is it so difficult to figure out what kind of insurance is mandatory for truck drivers under WSIB? I wonder those self claimed "representatives" ability to find the right tree to bark at.
-ruoer(乡下人);
2007-3-8
{189}
(#3541304@0)
-
当然要操心,路遥等人希望拿到配偶应得的钱,给安的母和子。如果没有配偶,拿到的钱很少,本来母亲就没有,儿子只有一点点。这个好像很久以前就讨论过了。
-niu1986(只吃草的牛);
2007-3-7
(#3539123@0)
-
Then I would call that fraud. So they want the "spouse" to get the money from the insurance company, then transfer it to An's son and mother? Isn't that too naive?
-ruoer(乡下人);
2007-3-7
(#3539126@0)
-
所以至今他们没有一个人去移民部,保险公司举报骗婚行为。而且一直寄希望与她吐出保险金。而且宣布告的对象一直是她,而不是保险公司。恐吓为主。在法庭上得到钱的概率几乎为零。
-niu1986(只吃草的牛);
2007-3-7
(#3539141@0)
-
"去移民部"? Do they have CONCRETE evidences to raise the eyebrows of those immigrant officers? If they do not have, just forget it.
-asker(amour);
2007-3-7
(#3539808@0)
-
写封信,对他们来说应该有利而无害。可能CIC某人太空了,希望弄点案子。英文媒体希望搞点眼球。反正就是一份检举信而已。better than nothing. 但是他们就是不做,值得怀疑。
-niu1986(只吃草的牛);
2007-3-8
(#3540395@0)
-
没被委托的委托人=伪劣委托人 (#3538703@0)
-tulipwa68(tulip);
2007-3-8
(#3540405@0)
-
举报信不需要委托人。甚至可以匿名。当然匿名的处理时间长一点。我一开始就支持举报。向CIC,媒体,议员举报。安是加公民,她是中国公民,严重点可以是中国公民诈骗加拿大公民。加拿大政府都应该站出来。但是慢慢他们变成寄托于她的主动,现在又想打官司。我觉得他们只是以恐吓为主,啥行动也没有。
-niu1986(只吃草的牛);
2007-3-8
{88}
(#3540620@0)
-
"可能CIC某人太空了,希望弄点案子。"? You make me laugh. :))))))))))CIC is one of the busiest department in Canada besides Ontario Transportation Department.
-asker(amour);
2007-3-8
(#3540418@0)
-
你根本不知道CIC在干什么。现在CIC真是特别希望揪出几个假结婚或其他的案子来拖延移民办案时间。不是我说的,我的议员说的。高山的案子也是为了这个。当然,目的是为中国人抹黑,拖延所有中国人的案子。今年父母移民的案子大家已经看到了。
-niu1986(只吃草的牛);
2007-3-8
(#3540607@0)
-
My last reply to you. I just don't understand why quite a few IGNORANT people try so hard to be EXPERTS. Give us a break.
-asker(amour);
2007-3-8
(#3540687@0)
-
他们的意思就是如果告她,她可能拿不到一分钱了,所以希望她吐出一部分,他们就不告了。这样皆大欢喜,她和安的家人都有钱拿。他们也成了正义的化身。但是这样简直把法律当无物。
-niu1986(只吃草的牛);
2007-3-7
(#3539156@0)
-
你好天真。如果那女的不存在,当然是安家拿钱了,难不成保险公司不赔了?难道单身青年死了就没钱了吗?
-mine888(老想上进);
2007-3-7
(#3539197@0)
-
当然。绝大多数不是专门买的人身保险都是这样的。如果车保险,雇主提供的意外险。当然,这需要看这件事的保险条款。我觉得这个保险和他的职业的雇主有关,很可能是类似于支付生活费的意外险。没有定额,但有最高额。
-niu1986(只吃草的牛);
2007-3-8
(#3540389@0)
-
Why did Zhang have the guts to leave An firmly and ruthlessly, and even confront the social worker? Because she is 100% sure that she is LEGALLY MARRIED, and nobody can overthrow her marital legitimacy.
-asker(amour);
2007-3-7
(#3539836@0)
-
Or she has no brain.
-ruoer(乡下人);
2007-3-8
(#3541247@0)