Is sharing work as a student plagiarism on my side when the fellow student admits to having copied my work?
-utgfxval3(蛙);
2023-12-26{833}(#15850970@0)
Answer (1 of 7): It’s considered collusion, and often has similar penalties to plagiarism. As it’s often quite hard to work out who copied from who, both students are generally punished (unless one admits it was them that copied).
I’ve seen friendships destroyed by collusion when it’s picked up....
Photo by Claudio Calligaris A grader for a course notices similarities between two assignments. It turns out that you loaned your finished work to your friend to give them an idea of how to proceed with the assignment. Without your knowledge, the friend copied some answers and handed in the homework. You assume that since you did not give permission to your friend to copy your work you have not violated the Code. Are you right? Answer No. Why is this an issue? Peer teaching and peer learning are important and effective study strategies for students. However, giving a completed assignment to a friend is not peer teaching and copying answers is not peer learning. Unintentionally or otherwise, the student who passed on the assignment enabled cheating to occur, and has therefore committed a violation.An interview with the disciplinary officer will be required. See the Code of Student Conduct and Disciplinary Procedures in the Handbook on Student Rights and Responsibilities for more details. How can it be avoided? Peer learning should be encouraged, since it helps students learn to teach. Instructors should explain effective peer teaching strategies such as working in pairs, sharing comments on work, and brainstorming solutions to problems in groups. Sharing completed work is not an acceptable peer learning technique. If a student has copied the answers of another student, the incident must be documented and the material sent to the course instructor, who will contact the appropriate disciplinary officer. Quick Fact If I tell my friend in another course section about quiz questions, is that cheating?If your friend has not yet written the quiz, both of you will have violated the Code; sharing unauthorized information and using unauthorized information are both offences. Related Information"Never have, never will, besides the person next to me probably knows less than I do." - Student response to survey question on reasons not to cheat.- Andrews, K. G., Smith, L. A., Henzi, D., & Demps, E. (2007). Faculty and student perceptions of academic integrity at U.S. and Canadian dental schools. Journal of Dental Education, 71, 1027-1039. Retrieved from web.
你以为呢?这种事父母居然不从小反复教育?机场你敢给陌生人看行李不?啥抄题,回答就一句,OVER MY DEAD BODY。部队里,战友告诉你,空膛没子弹,你不当场拉大栓检查枪膛,走火了两个人一起关禁闭受处分,这都是常识,连潜规则都算不上
-eleclan(eleclan);
2023-12-23(#15847167@0)+2
最好遇事不要慌张.从你的描述看你儿子本来是出自帮助别的目的.就是in good a faith. 跟抄袭或协助抄袭毫无关系. 如果你儿子将project show to others 是违规, 最多是一个warning. 对以后的学习工作等没有一点影响. 在学校调查期间千万不能作故事, 一定要实事求是作陈述. 如得到不理想的结果一定要申诉.
B同学请求我儿子有关这个项目的要求中的几个Function 的 东西传给他,我儿子说,You know what, I’ll just send everything of what I have so far,然后就传过去了,这就是他们当天的所有交流
-1day(一天);
2023-12-27(#15852315@0)
这边对学术欺诈的定义很严很广,除了文章,Code,甚至连 idea 相似都可以被怀疑为学术欺诈。所以,还是要教育孩子小心小心再小心。
-starrystarrynight(StarryNight);
2023-12-27(#15852373@0)+1
1. 如果没和 A 商量就给了 B,
-troyd(老陈);
2023-12-23{260}(#15847303@0)+5
就赶紧跟 A 说明自己自作主张分享了 CODE。2. 自己去解释,告诉老师 A 没有责任。是自己觉得 B 一个人做 workload 大,想给他些启示。觉得不抄是 common moral sense。把自己发的 EMAIL 给老师抄送。下次一定保护自己的知识产权。这次希望老师公平给分。只能 throw B off bus 了。
Academic Integrity policy 中首先是肯定并促进free exchange of ideas. 然后才强调responsibility 和制定规则.包括do not rent your homework to others. 如果被抄方认为只是share ideas, 学校是不能认定他是违规的.最后最多只是看作make an honor mistake.