"打朝鲜,打中国", for sure is in the U.S’ book just a matter of time or if deployable. 如果08/09不是意外,那哈勃就更无话可说了。为什么不有备无患呢?此前拿到了几百亿现金?要是沿着哈勃的死路,加拿大会跟美国一样或者更危险。
-thornthorn(Holy Moly);
2011-3-27(#6585297@0)
要是真有美国"打朝鲜,打中国"的一天, for sure 加拿大是要去的, 有条约的, 自由党,NDP,或愧人党在为都一样.
-newidid(**);
2011-3-27(#6585307@0)
没必要讨论下去了。-rockywei(落基山); 11:35 (#6585278@0) have a nice day. -thornthorn(Holy Moly); 11:50 (#6585315@0) re
-thornthorn(Holy Moly);
2011-3-27(#6585316@0)
dont see your logic between the evidence and the conclusion. One is personal choice, even yourself agree; the other is policy, against the constitution, how can that be in the paper?
-hr1551(hr1551);
2011-3-28(#6586601@0)