Dare to whisper a bit, there is no 贝斯提琴 instrument existed, Bass is bass, violin is violin, better not mix together。。。:-)
-noproblem(密西洒家。o O);
2009-11-26(#5708826@0)
like frozen wind from the remote.
-skitennis(tennisfan);
2009-11-26{182}(#5708283@0)
Well, May I ask what is the major difference between Tchaikovsky and Rachmaninoff?
Why it is important to be Simple?
What is 手法简洁? Or, more pure and condensed rich emotion?
答复Q1 - “what is the major difference between Tchaikovsky and Rachmaninoff? ”
-maer(马儿,岛主);
2009-11-26{184}(#5709062@0)
Now I can understand it. Thanks. Is there some occasions that Thcai is not 协奏繁杂 ? Is there any reason he keep this "Busy and Blubber" style, instead of improve it?
-skitennis(tennisfan);
2009-11-28(#5713027@0)
Thank you so much. This is a very good explanation about “简洁”. Like a beautiful expression in the Mathematics; Or a Poem - one more word ruin it, less word miss it.
-skitennis(tennisfan);
2009-11-28{156}(#5713060@0)
I do learned a lot from you. Last question, why there is almost none such 很简洁 and rich 旋律? Why I can't find great composer like Tch and Roch today?
柴可夫斯基<第六交响曲>第一乐章的第二主题呈示部,就写得非常简洁,而且旋律感极佳!老柴也有不少这样的上佳的作品 ----Tchaikovsky Sym-6 M1,--- Music inside, starting from 5:12.
-maer(马儿,岛主);
2009-11-29{477}(#5714102@0)
Thanks for your explaination. Also, He is more peaceful and thankful than other occasions, such as in his Piano Concerto #1.
-skitennis(tennisfan);
2009-11-29{550}(#5714856@0)
Tchaikovsky - Piano Concerto N. 1 - Part I
I like the "introduction" part of the first 1minutes or so. Then the repeat them part with the drum short after. Basically, I lost interest on the rest.
Tchaikovsky - String Quartet No.1, Op. 11 mov.2. this is one,may be called the cold, strict, sad, and careful piece of his style.
-skitennis(tennisfan);
2009-11-29{452}(#5715121@0)
Still, only he can compose this. Special beauty and strong expression without many instruments.