本文发表在 rolia.net 枫下论坛if john smith sent peter jackson a bullet with a proper label attached, saying it is some sort of ammo inside, when peter jackson signed off on the delivery invoice with his name, the transaction is completed. Peter thus completed his consent on receiving such a package. so Peter hardly can press charges to John nor canada post later.
If john smith send an ammo package with no labels and dropped in Peter's mailbox himself, that way, there is no explicit transaction occurs, so Peter sure has the option to sue John.
If john smith sent a firearm via canada post in a regular parcel to Peter, and peter did not know what's inside and received it from the postman, later found out what's inside and got pissed off, he can sue John or Canada post for sure.
To get away with it, canada post explicit ask the mailer to claim if or not belong to restricted/unacceptable items. for firearm, if accepted for post, it requires the mailer to choose signature option, which is part of the reasons that to have the consent of the receiving party.
so, no, firearm is not considered as a mailable item in canada post, more accurately, it is considered as a restricted item.
if it is accepted, certain procedures need to follow, and so , john smith can and is capable to send a firearm/ammo package to a peter jackson without getting his consent first. as long as the label and description is made obvious for Peter to know before accepting it.
hehe, I must be very bored. good to know there is someone reading.
--- writer claim statement begins ---
By reading writer's message, approximately 60 secs of reader's life is gone and can never be retrieved back.
Writer hereby does not warrant any useful information or monetary value in exchange of your lost time.
--- writer claim statement ends ---更多精彩文章及讨论，请光临枫下论坛 rolia.net
If john smith send an ammo package with no labels and dropped in Peter's mailbox himself, that way, there is no explicit transaction occurs, so Peter sure has the option to sue John.
If john smith sent a firearm via canada post in a regular parcel to Peter, and peter did not know what's inside and received it from the postman, later found out what's inside and got pissed off, he can sue John or Canada post for sure.
To get away with it, canada post explicit ask the mailer to claim if or not belong to restricted/unacceptable items. for firearm, if accepted for post, it requires the mailer to choose signature option, which is part of the reasons that to have the consent of the receiving party.
so, no, firearm is not considered as a mailable item in canada post, more accurately, it is considered as a restricted item.
if it is accepted, certain procedures need to follow, and so , john smith can and is capable to send a firearm/ammo package to a peter jackson without getting his consent first. as long as the label and description is made obvious for Peter to know before accepting it.
hehe, I must be very bored. good to know there is someone reading.
--- writer claim statement begins ---
By reading writer's message, approximately 60 secs of reader's life is gone and can never be retrieved back.
Writer hereby does not warrant any useful information or monetary value in exchange of your lost time.
--- writer claim statement ends ---更多精彩文章及讨论，请光临枫下论坛 rolia.net