本文发表在 rolia.net 枫下论坛From the legal point of view, she is entitled to get the insurance money unless he wrote the will before he passed away becouse she is the closest kin of him.
From the moral point of view ( according to the story of paper), a lot of people are not happy with her to grab that amount of money of her dead husband whom she doesn't care too much when he was still alive.
But "Bad reputation" won't impact her rights to get that bloody money. Law is cold and strict.
But I think SOMETIMES law is not everything. People need moral guidiance. Moral standards should play certain roles in a sociaty. We got to respect the majorty's opinion. When we try to emphasize our foundamental moral volue, we still cann't forget the law.
She has right to fight for that money. It is human nature and her legal right. But we also can use the legal weapon to against her will.
A lot of lawyers need name. The bigger name they can get, the more money they will make. If this case is famouse enough, some lawyer will do for free or a reasonable price. Then we can make this event big enough.
Try to find evidence to prove this marrige is a fake one or at least her motive is only want to move to Canada. Judges will consider the circumstantial evidence. The more evidence we can collect to damadge her, the biger chance we can benifit him. E-mails are one kind of evidence, but I am not sure they will benifit which party.
We need be cold too if we realy want to do something for the deseased party. Try to prove she is a cold bloody user, let lawyers make deal, if you don't want to be departed from Canada, you had better waive the right.
She is an negative example and deserve to be punished in a certain way.更多精彩文章及讨论，请光临枫下论坛 rolia.net