本文发表在 rolia.net 枫下论坛the compensation.
if she is indeed the legal beneficiary, then whether she wants to split the money with An's family is a matter of her personal choice, not a matter of obligation. losers or the weak ones
tend to mix obligation with personal choice -- that is why they are losers. if they stick to such mentality they will continue to be losers.
the fact An's wife might be the beneficiary of his life insurance has nothing to do with An's accidental death. if the accident did not happen she would not get one penny -- will we still blame her for being the beneficiary then?
the marriage between An and his wife is a contractual agreement between two adults. it is the result of an action of free choice. on what basis we accuse the wife being deceitful and engaging in conspiracy? did she held a pistol against An's head when they signed the marriage certificate? did she lied about her age, marital status, etc? if she did where is the proof and witness?
bottome line, An's wife has every right to leave An -- and vice versa. she is entitled for the compensation if she is so named.
the accident was horrible, sad and shocking. however, an accident cannot be the foundation of martredom.
the failure of a short-lived marriage is unfortunate and undesirable. but a matter of personal choice does not warrant chastisement in the form of witch-hunt.更多精彩文章及讨论，请光临枫下论坛 rolia.net