×

Loading...
Ad by
  • 最优利率和cashback可以申请特批,好信用好收入offer更好。请点链接扫码加微信咨询,Scotiabank -- Nick Zhang 6478812600。
Ad by
  • 最优利率和cashback可以申请特批,好信用好收入offer更好。请点链接扫码加微信咨询,Scotiabank -- Nick Zhang 6478812600。

Torontonian's comments (ZT)

本文发表在 rolia.net 枫下论坛I don’t eat Kraft dinner, I don’t drink wine from a box, and I don’t listen to John Tesh records, so why would I see a film based on such a piece of junk as the Da Vinci Code?
Shaun Smith, Toronto
I am curious so the critics won’t stop me from seeing the movie. I feel any movie with Tom Hanks in it is worth going to see.
Diana Delgado, Toronto

Yes, I will sure see the film. It’s a work of fiction and nobody has claimed it as a reality.
Adeel Aamer, Mississauga

I understand both views. Yes, the book challenges important Catholic truths; yes, the book is classified as "fiction." How about this for a reason to avoid the film: the book demonstrates poor character/plot development and a predictable conclusion. Why spend three hours in a theatre discovering that?
Marissa Sinclair, Markham

The book was fantastic (as are all of Dan Brown’s books). I have read the Da Vinci Code about three times now, and I am looking forward to seeing the movie.
Kari Snorek, Milwaukee

Having enjoyed the book, and knowing the artists involved in making the movie (Hanks, Howard), I had to see the movie and am glad I did (last night). It was exactly what I expected it to be, visually spectacular with the sets, well portrayed, and entertaining from start to finish. I think people should just see it for what it is, a well-told story.
Francine Wong, Trenton

If your religion does not allow you to watch a movie or read a book that explicitly deems itself a work of fiction, then there is something seriously undemocratic and unnatural about your faith.
Shourideh Molaei, Toronto

I thoroughly enjoyed the book! A total page-turner. I like the conspiracy theory. That said, I’m in no rush to see the movie. I cannot believe that any movie could do justice to the book.
Nathalie Warmerdam, Eganville, Ont.

It’s not just a movie. I know that everyone is saying it’s Hollywood, what’s everyone freaking out about? No one is freaking out. Certain groups are just upset that they took something as serious as religion and Jesus and put their own spin on it.
Gillian Wetheral, Oakville

All great book adaptations into movies have failed with one huge exception, which is in my opinion Gone With the Wind.
Irina Rapaport, Toronto

Nine bucks to see the hidden mystery that’s going to change our lives? Are you kidding, I’m going to see it twice and buy the DVD.
Kevin Quinn, Owen Sound

The book was a wonderful flight of fancy and if the book is respectful of key passages it should be an interesting 261/2-hour escape.
William Poutney, Toronto

The good thing is that some people might question their religious beliefs, educate themselves in science, logic, and critical thinking and maybe become less religious.
Stephan Ivanov, Toronto更多精彩文章及讨论,请光临枫下论坛 rolia.net
Report

Replies, comments and Discussions:

  • 枫下沙龙 / 休闲娱乐 / 刚看完达芬奇密码,相当吸引人,音乐,节奏,场景,表演都很好,紧扣原著,不知道这部电影还能拍成什么样 - 印第安娜琼斯? 影评都是扯淡。全场爆满,尽兴而归!强烈推荐。
    • 不用上班?真爽……
      • 利用午休。
        • 你们公司的午休时间好长啊!!!!!!
          • 忙的时候真忙,今天好多人都休假了。现场很多老人。看完还鼓掌。要买DVD,支持一把Tom Hanks 。
    • 太好了, 等这热乎劲过去了再去悠闲地看
    • 我一会就去看:P
    • 英文名是什么?
      • Da Vince Code
      • the da vince code
      • 土人们,是Da Vinci Code.
        • Both should be right
    • 俺觉得有点失望.书中很多精妙的推理演绎过程一掠而过,节奏也没有原著来的紧张.还是看书来的过瘾.
      • For general public, it is hard to show 推理演绎过程 in a 2.5 hr movie
      • 昨天和LD一起去看, 影院满座, 建议一定要看了书后再去看, 不然电影跳跃太大, 对话比较多, 不是很容易看明白, 而且还是书好看, 特别是推理部分. 电影无法表现. 而且电影还要面对大众. 能拍到这样已经算不错了.
        • really interesting. French english, Bratin ENGLISH, American English
        • 严重同意,我是看了电影后看的书,感觉都不错。虽然相比之下,书更清晰,细腻,传神!但是,电影能拍成这样已经很不错了,很尊重原著!
      • 对,好多心理的推测和暗示都没有也不可能演出来。尽管我是他的影迷,我还是认为我浪费了票钱。
      • 刚看完书,还不错,里面的介绍的一些相关知识还挺有意思的。就是对人物描写不够充分,特别是爱情什么的,再有就是警长的态度变化有点突兀。电影要去看的,但是结果我能猜出来,肯定书好看。
    • Torontonian's comments (ZT)
      本文发表在 rolia.net 枫下论坛I don’t eat Kraft dinner, I don’t drink wine from a box, and I don’t listen to John Tesh records, so why would I see a film based on such a piece of junk as the Da Vinci Code?
      Shaun Smith, Toronto
      I am curious so the critics won’t stop me from seeing the movie. I feel any movie with Tom Hanks in it is worth going to see.
      Diana Delgado, Toronto

      Yes, I will sure see the film. It’s a work of fiction and nobody has claimed it as a reality.
      Adeel Aamer, Mississauga

      I understand both views. Yes, the book challenges important Catholic truths; yes, the book is classified as "fiction." How about this for a reason to avoid the film: the book demonstrates poor character/plot development and a predictable conclusion. Why spend three hours in a theatre discovering that?
      Marissa Sinclair, Markham

      The book was fantastic (as are all of Dan Brown’s books). I have read the Da Vinci Code about three times now, and I am looking forward to seeing the movie.
      Kari Snorek, Milwaukee

      Having enjoyed the book, and knowing the artists involved in making the movie (Hanks, Howard), I had to see the movie and am glad I did (last night). It was exactly what I expected it to be, visually spectacular with the sets, well portrayed, and entertaining from start to finish. I think people should just see it for what it is, a well-told story.
      Francine Wong, Trenton

      If your religion does not allow you to watch a movie or read a book that explicitly deems itself a work of fiction, then there is something seriously undemocratic and unnatural about your faith.
      Shourideh Molaei, Toronto

      I thoroughly enjoyed the book! A total page-turner. I like the conspiracy theory. That said, I’m in no rush to see the movie. I cannot believe that any movie could do justice to the book.
      Nathalie Warmerdam, Eganville, Ont.

      It’s not just a movie. I know that everyone is saying it’s Hollywood, what’s everyone freaking out about? No one is freaking out. Certain groups are just upset that they took something as serious as religion and Jesus and put their own spin on it.
      Gillian Wetheral, Oakville

      All great book adaptations into movies have failed with one huge exception, which is in my opinion Gone With the Wind.
      Irina Rapaport, Toronto

      Nine bucks to see the hidden mystery that’s going to change our lives? Are you kidding, I’m going to see it twice and buy the DVD.
      Kevin Quinn, Owen Sound

      The book was a wonderful flight of fancy and if the book is respectful of key passages it should be an interesting 261/2-hour escape.
      William Poutney, Toronto

      The good thing is that some people might question their religious beliefs, educate themselves in science, logic, and critical thinking and maybe become less religious.
      Stephan Ivanov, Toronto更多精彩文章及讨论,请光临枫下论坛 rolia.net
    • 原作之所以好看是因为扣人心弦的推理和对人们猎奇心理的满足。电影在这方面很难做到完美。
    • 能不能解释一下电影最后情节, 男主人公想到了啥, 跑到那房子那里, 为何很伤心的样子, 女主人公是不是真找到家了? 别见怪, 没看过这小说,好像人人都懂, 可愣是一晚上都没想明白. 先谢了.
      • 那不是一座普通的房子,是卢浮宫广场上玻璃金字塔。Robert Langdon 最后时刻判断Mary Magdalene 遗体棺木就藏在金字塔地下,因为卢浮宫的馆长就是Grand Master,还有什么地方比这里更安全的呢?
        • 那是一个倒金字塔, 广场上的那个正金字塔(小头朝上)是中国人贝先生设计的,这个是在内部的倒金字塔(小头朝下的,即显出一个V型,在兰教授第一次到罗浮宫曾拍过一个镜头的), 所以在电影里可以看见兰教授是蹲在地上向下望.