×

Loading...
Ad by
  • 推荐 OXIO 加拿大高速网络,最低月费仅$40. 使用推荐码 RCR37MB 可获得一个月的免费服务
Ad by
  • 推荐 OXIO 加拿大高速网络,最低月费仅$40. 使用推荐码 RCR37MB 可获得一个月的免费服务

STEPHEN HARPER CAN'T HIDE HIS NEO-CON SPOTS

本文发表在 rolia.net 枫下论坛In January 2001, Stephen Harper and five others published an open
letter in the National Post urging Alberta to beef up its fight with
Ottawa by building a "firewall" around itself and take greater
control over its own affairs.

Complaining that tax revenues from Alberta were subsidizing other
Canadians, the "firewall letter" sounded downright hostile to the
rest of the country.

Its attitude is typical of a group of right wingers, centred around
U.S-born academic Tom Flanagan of the University of Calgary. This
"Calgary school," with which Harper is very closely allied, peddles
a Canadian version of Paul Wolfowitz-style neo-conservatism, and it
likes the idea of using oil-rich Alberta as a right-wing battering ram
against the more socially democratic vision of Canada that prevails in
much of the rest of the country.

Certainly, the authors of the "firewall letter" don't sound much
concerned about fostering national unity - presumably something we'd
expect in a prime minister.

If the "firewall letter" had been published during this campaign,
Harper would almost certainly be heading for a crushing defeat, instead
of perhaps poised to become prime minister.

I bet most Canadians don't know about the letter, or have forgotten
what's in it. After all, people don't have time to go looking up what
Harper wrote years ago.

The media have time, but little interest. Instead, the media treat the
campaign as a horse race, fixating on polls, offering voters little
more than their own reflection in the mirror.

So, despite the "firewall letter," the Conservative campaign has
largely got away with spinning Harper as a strong defender of Canada
and Canadian sovereignty - and independent of Washington.

Carefully out of sight is Harper's attack on Ottawa two years ago for
not joining the U.S. invasion of Iraq. Harper even stirred the waters
of anti-Canadian feeling south of the border by denouncing Ottawa's
decision in an interview with U.S. TV channel Fox News, and also in The
Wall Street Journal.

No wonder Harper was recently lauded in the Washington Times as
"pro-Iraq war, anti-Kyoto, and socially conservative ... the most
pro-American leader in the western world."

Also gone from sight is Harper's suggestion three years ago that Canada
was becoming a "second-tier socialistic country." Now, according to
Harper, this is a "great country."

Is Harper showing a willingness to compromise?

Not likely.

As fellow right-wing Albertan Ted Byfield once noted in an interview
with the Walrus magazine: "I don't think (Harper) knows how to
compromise. It's not in his genes. The issue now is: How do we fool the
world into thinking we're moving left when we're not?"

No problem.

With a co-operative media, Harper has managed to render largely
invisible his links to a cabal of right wingers determined to transform
Canada in the way their American counterparts transformed the U.S. -
despite widespread Canadian revulsion for George W. Bush's America.更多精彩文章及讨论,请光临枫下论坛 rolia.net
Report

Replies, comments and Discussions:

  • 枫下茶话 / 政治经济 / STEPHEN HARPER CAN'T HIDE HIS NEO-CON SPOTS
    本文发表在 rolia.net 枫下论坛In January 2001, Stephen Harper and five others published an open
    letter in the National Post urging Alberta to beef up its fight with
    Ottawa by building a "firewall" around itself and take greater
    control over its own affairs.

    Complaining that tax revenues from Alberta were subsidizing other
    Canadians, the "firewall letter" sounded downright hostile to the
    rest of the country.

    Its attitude is typical of a group of right wingers, centred around
    U.S-born academic Tom Flanagan of the University of Calgary. This
    "Calgary school," with which Harper is very closely allied, peddles
    a Canadian version of Paul Wolfowitz-style neo-conservatism, and it
    likes the idea of using oil-rich Alberta as a right-wing battering ram
    against the more socially democratic vision of Canada that prevails in
    much of the rest of the country.

    Certainly, the authors of the "firewall letter" don't sound much
    concerned about fostering national unity - presumably something we'd
    expect in a prime minister.

    If the "firewall letter" had been published during this campaign,
    Harper would almost certainly be heading for a crushing defeat, instead
    of perhaps poised to become prime minister.

    I bet most Canadians don't know about the letter, or have forgotten
    what's in it. After all, people don't have time to go looking up what
    Harper wrote years ago.

    The media have time, but little interest. Instead, the media treat the
    campaign as a horse race, fixating on polls, offering voters little
    more than their own reflection in the mirror.

    So, despite the "firewall letter," the Conservative campaign has
    largely got away with spinning Harper as a strong defender of Canada
    and Canadian sovereignty - and independent of Washington.

    Carefully out of sight is Harper's attack on Ottawa two years ago for
    not joining the U.S. invasion of Iraq. Harper even stirred the waters
    of anti-Canadian feeling south of the border by denouncing Ottawa's
    decision in an interview with U.S. TV channel Fox News, and also in The
    Wall Street Journal.

    No wonder Harper was recently lauded in the Washington Times as
    "pro-Iraq war, anti-Kyoto, and socially conservative ... the most
    pro-American leader in the western world."

    Also gone from sight is Harper's suggestion three years ago that Canada
    was becoming a "second-tier socialistic country." Now, according to
    Harper, this is a "great country."

    Is Harper showing a willingness to compromise?

    Not likely.

    As fellow right-wing Albertan Ted Byfield once noted in an interview
    with the Walrus magazine: "I don't think (Harper) knows how to
    compromise. It's not in his genes. The issue now is: How do we fool the
    world into thinking we're moving left when we're not?"

    No problem.

    With a co-operative media, Harper has managed to render largely
    invisible his links to a cabal of right wingers determined to transform
    Canada in the way their American counterparts transformed the U.S. -
    despite widespread Canadian revulsion for George W. Bush's America.更多精彩文章及讨论,请光临枫下论坛 rolia.net
    • the National Post again.