本文发表在 rolia.net 枫下论坛Why not?
Did we finish discover the entire world? Every respect of the natural as well as people mind? No. And I think this is a no end jouney.
With respect of so called Scientific way, is evolution really been studied Scientific way? If it is not, why should it be taught while ID should not.
When people's idea is restricted to that "Evolution is Schience while ID is not", then whenever new evidences or discoveries come out, people would not question them in thinking that ID is another possibility. This is no different than what the Religion Judge did in the middle age.
Back to my teacher's rybosame study. The only evidence he found is that this rybosame has a similiar shape to a DNA Polymerase. So his hypothesis is that rybosame is an earlier stage of life in evolution. I was quit admirable at the beginning when I took his course. But later on, after I converted to Christian, I restudied this topic. rybosame is consist of RNAs while DNA Ploymerase is consist of Amino Acids. It is like saying that two doors, one made of wood while the other made of steel. But since they are so alike, so it is evidence that steel door is an evolution result of wood door.
Guess if ID can stay in Scientific field, ID argument can be made. I am not saying his hypothesis is completely wrong, but at least ID gives us a ne way to look at the evidence.
Isn't that Science?更多精彩文章及讨论,请光临枫下论坛 rolia.net
Did we finish discover the entire world? Every respect of the natural as well as people mind? No. And I think this is a no end jouney.
With respect of so called Scientific way, is evolution really been studied Scientific way? If it is not, why should it be taught while ID should not.
When people's idea is restricted to that "Evolution is Schience while ID is not", then whenever new evidences or discoveries come out, people would not question them in thinking that ID is another possibility. This is no different than what the Religion Judge did in the middle age.
Back to my teacher's rybosame study. The only evidence he found is that this rybosame has a similiar shape to a DNA Polymerase. So his hypothesis is that rybosame is an earlier stage of life in evolution. I was quit admirable at the beginning when I took his course. But later on, after I converted to Christian, I restudied this topic. rybosame is consist of RNAs while DNA Ploymerase is consist of Amino Acids. It is like saying that two doors, one made of wood while the other made of steel. But since they are so alike, so it is evidence that steel door is an evolution result of wood door.
Guess if ID can stay in Scientific field, ID argument can be made. I am not saying his hypothesis is completely wrong, but at least ID gives us a ne way to look at the evidence.
Isn't that Science?更多精彩文章及讨论,请光临枫下论坛 rolia.net