This website requires Javascript to function properly. Please go to the setting of your web browser and enable Javascript for this website.

Ad by

最优利率和cashback可以申请特批，好信用好收入offer更好。请点链接扫码加微信咨询，Scotiabank -- Nick Zhang 6478812600。

Ad by

最优利率和cashback可以申请特批，好信用好收入offer更好。请点链接扫码加微信咨询，Scotiabank -- Nick Zhang 6478812600。

关门的还有Nextdoor, Reddit, Yahoo, the list can go on. The reason why social media platforms are in general NOT held liable for the actions of their users partially is Section 230 of Communications Decency Act (CDA).

europa( )

CDA protects freedom of speech online by first protecting the intermediaries (e.g. Twitter) users rely on. By no means this encourages the hate speech, absusive language and all that, the misconducting individual may face civil lawsuits instead of the platform.

By the way Canada does not have Section 230 equivalent in place but tends to shadow our US neighbour when precedents / references are needed.

How easy can one build a civil or other cases on social media? It's easy when it comes to hate speech, terrorist propaganda, child pornagraph, racism but it is hard to build cases around defamation, including but not limited to libel and slander. Multiple facets account for such challenge but that's a different topic.

(#15381948@0)
Last Updated: 2023-4-28
This post has been archived. It cannot be replied.

Report

Replies, comments and Discussions:

工作学习 / 事业工作 / 一场 200多块钱，引发的血案！:( 最近这个话题很多，没有太仔细看 ... 就知道瓜很大 :( -boolean(村支书_铁蛋儿); 2023-4-28 (#15381690@0)

报告支书，23块钱er -**🐣; 2023-4-28 (#15381694@0) +3

23块？ R u kidding me？ ☹ -boolean(村支书_铁蛋儿); 2023-4-28 (#15381703@0)

实际是23$ 引发230$ -wifi(圆方); 2023-4-28 (#15381713@0)

肉联哪哪的都是行走的40万，咋还跟这么点小钱儿较上劲了？ -boolean(村支书_铁蛋儿); 2023-4-28 (#15381727@0)

铁蛋你们村人忙，你走了忘本了。我看这肉连有一半在美帝的吧？ -**🐣; 2023-4-28 (#15381762@0)

其实就是自用的一根棍子而已，想要拍卖，开价23，如果多加些形容词和使用体会，可能会有人收，否则一文不值 -volodz(三俗); 2023-4-28 (#15381729@0) +2

已经上升到法律层面了，大家发言要小心，你可以保持沉默，但你说的每一句都将作为呈堂证供 -lanblue(蓝); 2023-4-28 (#15381733@0)

嗯，卡瓦闹 30 年前的事都被翻出来。 -troyd(老陈); 2023-4-28 (#15381747@0)
他老人家不是说：言者无罪，闻者足戒嘛！ 😄 -boolean(村支书_铁蛋儿); 2023-4-28 (#15381768@0)

他老人家的话在加拿大不起作用啊 -bigsquirrel(大松鼠); 2023-4-28 (#15382008@0)

开什么玩笑，以为这里还都是厦大的？搞清楚什么叫私人领域，让你说的推特脸书油管早就关门了 -volodz(三俗); 2023-4-28 (#15381773@0) +5

关门的还有Nextdoor, Reddit, Yahoo, the list can go on. The reason why social media platforms are in general NOT held liable for the actions of their users partially is Section 230 of Communications Decency Act (CDA). -europa( ); 2023-4-28 {742} (#15381948@0) +4
CDA protects freedom of speech online by first protecting the intermediaries (e.g. Twitter) users rely on. By no means this encourages the hate speech, absusive language and all that, the misconducting individual may face civil lawsuits instead of the platform.
By the way Canada does not have Section 230 equivalent in place but tends to shadow our US neighbour when precedents / references are needed.
How easy can one build a civil or other cases on social media? It's easy when it comes to hate speech, terrorist propaganda, child pornagraph, racism but it is hard to build cases around defamation, including but not limited to libel and slander. Multiple facets account for such challenge but that's a different topic.

👍 所以说到别的网站码文讲故事，灰常灰常好，说得越多越好。ta控制不住其他网友的发言，就象ta说水手在这里发贴是搞网暴，她现在同样在搞👉supplement with leverage. 她会到这边瞄，这边的发言她都看得到🤣 -hotmoon(梵高的耳朵); 2023-4-28 (#15382240@0) +1

@Ontario

关门的还有Nextdoor, Reddit, Yahoo, the list can go on. The reason why social media platforms are in general NOT held liable for the actions of their users partially is Section 230 of Communications Decency Act (CDA).

Replies, comments and Discussions:

More Topics